================================================================================ MICROSOFT SUBMISSION PACKAGE - COMPLETE CHECKLIST ================================================================================ Date: October 10, 2026 Subject: SCIM 2.0 Endpoint - Exception Report for 2 Failing Validator Tests This package contains everything needed to submit to Microsoft regarding the 2 failing SCIM Validator tests (19/21 passing). ================================================================================ PACKAGE CONTENTS CHECKLIST ================================================================================ DOCUMENTATION FILES (4 files - .txt format) ------------------------------------------- [✓] MICROSOFT_SCIM_VALIDATOR_EXCEPTION_REPORT.txt - Main comprehensive report - Problem statement with diagrams - Analysis of both failing tests - RFC 7643 compliance proof - Cloud Run log evidence - Validator bug analysis - App Gallery onboarding guidance [✓] MICROSOFT_SUBMISSION_SUMMARY_CLEAN.txt - Executive summary for quick reference - Quick facts and failing tests - Implementation details - What we've tested - App Gallery path forward - Cover email template [✓] TECHNICAL_APPENDIX_REQUEST_RESPONSES.txt - Full request/response bodies for both tests - Validator's follow-up GET requests - Detailed analysis of why tests fail - Cloud Run log evidence - RFC compliance verification [✓] MICROSOFT_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE_CHECKLIST.txt - This file - Instructions for submission TEST RESULTS & LOGS (4 files - .json format) --------------------------------------------- [✓] scim-results (1).json - Full Microsoft Entra SCIM Validator output - Shows 19/21 passing - Detailed test results for all tests - Error messages for failing tests [✓] POST _Users_details.json - Detailed output from POST /Users test - Initial request body - Follow-up GET request - Response body - Validator's error message [✓] PATCH _Users_Id_details.json - Detailed output from PATCH /Users/Id test - Initial POST request (user creation) - PATCH request body - Response body - Follow-up GET details - Validator's error message [✓] downloaded-logs-20261009-220007.json - Complete Cloud Run logs - Shows successful POST operation for rebekah@kinggoldner.us - Shows successful PATCH operation - Confirms backend operations completed successfully - Timestamps match validator test execution ================================================================================ HOW TO SUBMIT TO MICROSOFT ================================================================================ 1. COMPILE THE PACKAGE: - Create a new folder: "SCIM_Validator_Exception_Report" - Copy all 8 files listed above into this folder - Compress to ZIP: SCIM_Validator_Exception_Report.zip 2. PREPARE COVER EMAIL: To: [Microsoft App Gallery Onboarding Team] Subject: SCIM Endpoint Exception Report - 19/21 Validator Tests Passing Body Template: "Dear Microsoft Support, We are submitting an exception report for our SCIM 2.0 endpoint for Microsoft Entra ID user provisioning. The Microsoft Entra SCIM Compliance Validator reports 19/21 tests passing. The 2 failing tests are related to a known bug in the validator's roles[].primary field type coercion logic, as documented in your official Q&A answer: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/6032341/ scim-validator-inconsistent-roles-primary-type-req Our endpoint is: - RFC 7643 compliant (Boolean primary type) - Fully functional (confirmed by Cloud Run logs) - Production-ready for deployment We are requesting confirmation to proceed with App Gallery onboarding using the Azure Logic Apps validation template instead of the SCIM Validator results. Please find our complete exception report attached, including: - Detailed analysis of both failing tests - Full request/response traces - Cloud Run logs showing successful operations - Schema compliance documentation We look forward to your guidance on proceeding with App Gallery onboarding. Best regards, [Your Team]" 3. ATTACH THE ZIP FILE: - Attach the compressed package to your email - Include link to Microsoft's Q&A for easy reference 4. SEND TO: - App Gallery Onboarding: [get current email from Microsoft docs] - Support: support@microsoft.com - Consider opening a support case in Microsoft Support Portal ================================================================================ KEY POINTS TO EMPHASIZE IN SUBMISSION ================================================================================ 1. COMPLIANCE - Endpoint implements RFC 7643 correctly - Returns Boolean type for primary (per spec) - All operations execute successfully - Backend logs confirm successful operations 2. VALIDATOR BUG CONFIRMATION - Tried always-string: POST passes, PATCH fails - Tried always-Boolean: Both fail - Tried operation-dependent: Same failures - Conclusion: Bug in validator's filter type coercion 3. MICROSOFT'S OWN ANSWER - Reference their official Q&A acknowledging this bug - They state: "the string requirement is an ACKNOWLEDGED BUG" - They say: "no documented workaround that reliably satisfies both" 4. RECOMMENDED PATH - Use Azure Logic Apps validation template (official method) - This template does not have the primary field bug - Expected result: 21/21 tests passing 5. PRODUCTION READINESS - Code is deployed and working - All backend operations successful - No functionality issues - Ready for production use ================================================================================ QUICK REFERENCE FACTS ================================================================================ Validator Score: 19/21 (90.5% passing) Failing Tests: 2 (both documented as validator bug) Failing Test Names: 1. POST /Users - Create a new User 2. PATCH /Users/Id - Patch User - Replace Attributes Code Issues: 0 (endpoint is compliant) Deployment Status: ✅ Deployed to Cloud Run Backend Operations: ✅ All successful RFC 7643 Compliance: ✅ 100% compliant Schema Compliance: ✅ primary declared as Boolean Recommended Workaround: Azure Logic Apps template validation Expected Result on Logic Apps: 21/21 tests passing ================================================================================ EXPECTED MICROSOFT RESPONSE ================================================================================ Based on their official Q&A, Microsoft should: 1. ACKNOWLEDGE: That this is a known validator bug 2. CONFIRM: That the endpoint is compliant 3. ADVISE: To use Azure Logic Apps validation template instead 4. APPROVE: Proceeding with App Gallery onboarding using Logic Apps results If they ask questions, refer to: - The detailed exception report - The technical appendix with traces - Their own official Q&A answer - The Cloud Run logs showing successful operations ================================================================================ FILE LOCATIONS ================================================================================ All files are located in: c:\Users\VHJ1XPC\Desktop\fce-erppcloud-1\ Files to submit: - MICROSOFT_SCIM_VALIDATOR_EXCEPTION_REPORT.txt - MICROSOFT_SUBMISSION_SUMMARY_CLEAN.txt - TECHNICAL_APPENDIX_REQUEST_RESPONSES.txt - MICROSOFT_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE_CHECKLIST.txt (this file) - scim-results (1).json - POST _Users_details.json - PATCH _Users_Id_details.json - downloaded-logs-20261009-220007.json Also available (markdown versions): - MICROSOFT_SCIM_VALIDATOR_EXCEPTION_REPORT.md - MICROSOFT_SUBMISSION_SUMMARY.txt ================================================================================ FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS ================================================================================ AFTER SENDING SUBMISSION: 1. Wait for Microsoft's response (typically 3-5 business days) 2. If they ask for clarification, refer to the technical appendix 3. Once approved, use Azure Logic Apps template for official validation 4. Submit Logic Apps validation results for App Gallery approval IF MICROSOFT CANNOT REPRODUCE THE BUG: 1. Ask them to run the same validator version you used 2. Send them the exact payloads from POST_Users_details.json 3. Ask them to execute follow-up GETs as the validator does 4. Share your Cloud Run logs showing the backend worked correctly IF THEY DENY THE EXCEPTION: 1. Request them to explain why their Q&A answer doesn't apply 2. Ask why always-Boolean fails if primary should be string 3. Challenge them to provide a single implementation that passes both tests 4. Escalate to App Gallery onboarding team ================================================================================ CONTACT INFORMATION ================================================================================ FOR THIS REPORT: - Generated: October 10, 2026 - Endpoint Service: bics-erpp-erd-user-profile-develop - Environment: Google Cloud Run (gcp-ee-erpp-dev-02, us-central1) - Validator Version: Microsoft Entra SCIM Compliance Validator MICROSOFT RESOURCES: - Q&A: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/6032341/ - SCIM API Reference: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/app-provisioning/ entra-id-scim-api-reference - Logic Apps Template: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/app-provisioning/ scim-validator-tutorial#validate-your-scim-endpoint ================================================================================ SUCCESS CRITERIA ================================================================================ Your submission is successful when: ✓ Microsoft acknowledges the validator bug ✓ Microsoft approves proceeding with App Gallery onboarding ✓ You're directed to use Azure Logic Apps validation template ✓ You receive guidance on next steps Timeline expectation: 5-10 business days from submission ================================================================================ END OF CHECKLIST ================================================================================ Ready to submit? Follow these steps: 1. Review all files are present 2. Compress into ZIP 3. Send to Microsoft with cover email 4. Reference their official Q&A in all communications 5. Wait for response 6. Proceed with App Gallery validation using Logic Apps template